
Democrat · Michigan's 10th District · 2026
Christina Hines
Hines grew up in Macomb County and attended Warren Woods schools before studying at Michigan and Wayne State Law.
Biography
In Christina Hines's family, her father, brother, husband, oldest son and her husband's father are all named David.1 She and her husband are raising three children in Macomb County, where she grew up attending Warren Woods public schools.2 She says the decision to run involved family discussions about their children, finances and giving up her prosecutor's paycheck.1
Hines attended the University of Michigan and earned her law degree at Wayne State.2 She began at the Wayne County Prosecutor's Office, spent several years in its special victims unit and later became first assistant in Washtenaw County's appeals division.3 Her earlier bid for elected office was an unsuccessful 2024 campaign for Macomb County prosecutor.4
Her name appears on a 2021 Michigan Supreme Court amicus brief arguing that the state's civil rights law prohibits discrimination based on sexual orientation.5 She also helped create Washtenaw County's restorative justice program, writing about that work in the Michigan Bar Journal.3 The program offered eligible cases a voluntary process involving both the person harmed and the person responsible, rather than automatically pursuing conventional prosecution.6
Her congressional platform promises lower household costs, stronger schools and a ban on congressional stock trading.2 She also supports reproductive rights.4 She faces Republican Mike Bouchard in the November 3 election for the open seat John James is leaving to run for governor, covering southern Macomb County and part of Oakland County.7
Record and controversies
Dismissal of a 2021 prosecution
Campaign ads criticize Hines for dismissing a 2021 sexual assault prosecution.8 A Metro Times review of court and forensic records found that her dismissal motion cited substantial exculpatory evidence and insufficient evidence even for probable cause; a judge dismissed the charges without prejudice.8 Some additional forensic evidence arrived after the dismissal, and the complainant continues to allege abuse; no trial determined that every allegation was false.8