
Democrat · California's 2nd District · 2026
Jared Huffman
Huffman was an All American volleyball player at UC Santa Barbara and played for the U.S. national team before going to law school.
Biography
Jared Huffman came to UC Santa Barbara from Independence, Missouri, on a volleyball scholarship.1 He became a three time All American setter and played for the USA Volleyball Team in 1987.2 He lives in San Rafael with his wife, Susan, a teacher, and has two children.3 His interests outside politics include fishing, hiking and tennis.3
After graduating from UCSB, he earned his law degree at Boston College.3 He worked on race and gender discrimination cases and became a Natural Resources Defense Council senior attorney.3 At NRDC, he helped forge an agreement intended to restore a 153 mile stretch of the San Joaquin River.2 The settlement was reached in 2006.4
Huffman served on the Marin Municipal Water District board from 1994 to 2006, then spent six years in California's Assembly, where he chaired Water, Parks and Wildlife.3 He entered Congress in January 2013 and is now the Natural Resources Committee's top Democrat.5 He also serves on Transportation and Infrastructure.6
His priorities include preparing communities for wildfires and drought and protecting coastlines from offshore oil and gas drilling.3 He supports expanded broadband, public schools, special education and affordable housing.3 As a cofounder and cochair of the Congressional Freethought Caucus, he advocates secular government and public policy grounded in reason and science.3 He faces Robin Littau in November.7
Record and controversies
Israel aid lawsuit
In December 2024, Northern California taxpayers sued Huffman and Mike Thompson, alleging that their votes to fund Israel's military contributed to genocide in Gaza.8 Explaining his vote that April, Huffman had supported Israel's security while calling for stronger legal and humanitarian safeguards, as well as aid for Palestinian civilians.9 On February 10, 2025, the court dismissed the suit for lack of jurisdiction, holding that it presented a political question the judiciary could not decide.10 The dismissal did not decide the allegations on their merits.10