
Democrat · Oregon governor · 2026
Tina Kotek
Kotek worked on hunger and children’s issues before she entered the Oregon Legislature.
Biography
Tina Kotek completed her University of Oregon undergraduate degree without student debt, with help from a Pell grant, work study and affordable tuition.1 She moved from the East Coast to Oregon in 1987.1 She and her wife, Aimee Kotek Wilson, have a dog; Aimee has worked as a community mental health social worker.1
Before elected office, Kotek worked as an advocate at Oregon Food Bank and policy director at Children First for Oregon.2 First elected to represent North Portland in 2006, she became House speaker in 2013 and served until January 2022.2 She was elected governor later that year and took office in January 2023.2
As governor, Kotek signed a 2024 housing package creating a state housing production office and allowing limited expansions of urban growth boundaries.3 She also signed legislation restoring criminal penalties for drug possession while creating treatment deflection programs.4 Those changes followed her declaration of a homelessness emergency at the start of her administration.2
Her reelection platform calls for statewide universal preschool, more classroom time and stronger graduation requirements.5 She also proposes continued housing investment, more land ready for development and replacing the state's economic development agency with a Department of Commerce.5 She supports a moratorium on new data centers and presents a second term as an opportunity to continue her policies on affordability and public services.5 She faces Republican Christine Drazan in a rematch of their 2022 contest.6
Record and controversies
Spouse role complaints dismissed
In June 2024, Oregon's ethics commission dismissed complaints about the governmental role Kotek gave her spouse, Aimee Kotek Wilson, after splitting evenly on whether to investigate further.7 Commission staff recommended dismissal because they found no financial benefit supporting the alleged ethics or nepotism violations; four commissioners wanted more inquiry, and five votes were required to proceed.7 Kotek defended her spouse's relevant experience and volunteer role and sought formal guidance.7 The dismissal was not a finding that Kotek violated ethics law.7